Home / Education & Learning Schools & Curriculum / SEND Reform Under Fire: Ministers Accused of “Diluting” Plans Amid £6bn Funding Crisis

SEND Reform Under Fire: Ministers Accused of “Diluting” Plans Amid £6bn Funding Crisis

SEND Reform Under Fire: Ministers Accused of "Diluting" Plans Amid £6bn Funding Crisis

As the government prepares to unveil its long-awaited Schools White Paper next month, reports have surfaced that Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson may “water down” SEND reforms following a potential backbench rebellion and a massive national funding deficit.

The news comes as a petition signed by over 130,000 parents was handed to 10 Downing Street today, demanding that the government does not “betray” families by using the new reforms as a cover for cost-cutting.

The “Lockstep” Debate

According to reports in The Times today, the Department for Education and No. 10 are “working in lockstep” to finalize a plan that could see the use of Education, Health and Care Plans (EHCPs) restricted only to children with the most “severe and complex” needs.

Currently, 5.3% of all pupils in England have an EHCP—up from 4.8% just last year. Ministers are reportedly concerned that the system is becoming “financially unsustainable,” with many local authorities facing individual SEND deficits of up to £6 million.

A “Postcode Lottery” for Provision

The F40 campaign, a group representing 43 local authorities, has warned today that without a significant cash injection, the UK is heading toward a “permanent postcode lottery.” They argue that the current funding model unfairly penalizes rural and underfunded councils, forcing them to choose between legally-binding SEND support and keeping mainstream school lights on.

Neil Duncan Jordan, MP for Poole, who led the petition hand-in at Westminster, stated: “If these reforms are just a way of cutting costs and leaving families high and dry, it will be a complete betrayal. Parents already feel overlooked and marginalized—they need a voice, not a budget cut.”

The Union Backlash

The teaching unions have also entered the fray. Following the government’s recent announcement of a £200m training package, the NASUWT and ASCL warned today that training alone is “barely a drop in the bucket.”

Union leaders argue that while upskilling teachers is vital, it cannot replace the specialist support services—such as educational psychologists and speech therapists—that have been “decimated” over the last decade.


Website Sidebar: What’s at Stake in the February White Paper?

  • The “Threshold” Change: Will the government raise the bar for who qualifies for an EHCP?
  • The Funding Gap: A projected £6 billion national deficit in SEND budgets by 2028.
  • The “Inclusion” Mandate: New expectations for mainstream schools to support SEND pupils without additional statutory funding.
  • The Parent Voice: 130,000 signatures calling for ring-fenced EHCP funding.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Sign up to keep up to date

Sign up to receive awesome content in your inbox, every month.

Category List

accountability and oversight adaptation policy AI oversight model AI safety vs innovation algorithmic transparency bias and discrimination community services cost of living policy cyber resilience data governance data protection and AI digital public services equality impact evidence-based policy government consultations human rights implications ICO AI guidance impact assessment implementation timeline inequalities UK inflation and households interoperability labour market changes legal & rights local government funding ministerial announcement model governance notherelong news parliamentary update productivity policy public policy analysis public sector reform public services reform regulator guidance SME regulation spending review stakeholder response statutory duties technology trust in institutions UK AI regulation UK policy explained Westminster briefing what it means for you workforce shortages

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x