The UK government is facing growing pressure to introduce a ban on social media use for under-16s, with senior peers in the House of Lords backing an amendment that could force social platforms to block younger users.
In recent parliamentary activity, the House of Lords has voted in favour of an amendment to the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill that would require social media companies to employ “highly effective” age-verification systems to ensure users under 16 cannot access their services within 12 months of the bill passing.
Ministers have already launched a public consultation on whether to introduce an Australia-style ban on social media for under-16s — mirroring policy recently implemented in Australia — and are also exploring tougher age checks and restrictions on addictive features in apps.
What’s Next in Parliament
The Lords’ amendment now sends the bill back to the House of Commons, where MPs will decide whether to accept the change. If approved, the requirement could become UK law and force platforms to block younger users. Without it, the government’s consultation — set to report its findings in the spring or summer — will guide any future legislation.
Debate and Criticism
Supporters argue the ban could protect children from harmful content and mental health risks, while critics — including some politicians — warn it may be impractical or create a “cliff edge” when young people turn 16 without prior experience on social platforms.
International Context
The move comes as Australia’s ban on under-16s using major social media platforms has already taken effect, and UK policymakers are closely watching how that policy plays out.
A final decision on whether to enshrine the ban in law could emerge in the coming months as the bill progresses and the government responds to the consultation.
Sources: Sky News reporting.
